Why Hire a Insurance Claims Lawyer Houston with a similar background to yourself: Asian, Chinese, Philippine, Vietnamese, El Salvador, Guatemalan, Canadian, German, Latino, Mexican, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Greek, Romanian, Cuban, Korean, Indian, Hispanic, American, Foreign, Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Orthodox, Mormon, or Buddhist?
If you do you will need a lawyer. The trouble is there are several thousand Attorneys out there just on the internet and the choice in finding a Insurance Claims Lawyer Houston appropriate for your case becomes more difficult. When you are trying to find a representative there are a few guidelines you will want to follow. Below you will find out how to choose the appropriate lawyer for your needs.
When trying to find a lawyer you first must understand the case you have. Some cases are very easy to determine, for instance those who have been in an accident often have personal injury needs. Those with problems at a hospital with a medical condition will have a malpractice suit and on and on. Once you have determined the type of representative you need, finding a lawyer becomes a little easier.
You may have a general practice representative or someone you have dealt with in Insurance Claims Lawyer Houston law. Most of us know someone who has had a attorney in the past. In this case you can ask the person for a referral. If you have a business lawyer you can ask them to recommend someone in the field of expertise you need. They will often have at least one name for you and a few to keep away from. Those who have worked with lawyers such as family or friends will also be able to give recommendations. They may say you don’t want this person or that their associate can help you. In either case you are better off to ask for a referral in finding a lawyer rather than other options.
The key to finding a representative that will help you out is knowing as much about them professionally as possible. You want to understand how many years they have practiced and what their specialty really is. Other wise you may find someone who is more out for the gain they will get rather than the gain you will get. When you deal with finding a lawyer, ask them their policies. Kind of interview them during the course of the conversation as well. Some will not charge unless the case is won, while others will charge a small fee during the entire process. It will depend on the case and of course your representative.
Two Main Elements of Construction ClaimsDefinition of "Contract"A contract is defined as an agreement between two parties that creates a legal obligation for both parties to perform a specified act. In a contract, each party is bound by law to perform the requested duties or to render a monetary payment. Something of value must be exchanged between the two parties in order to make their promises enforceable.A "breach of contract" occurs if either party fails to perform their specified duties. The other non-breaching party may be entitled to legal or equitable relief, especially if they have already performed on their end of the bargain.Written and Oral ContractsCourts almost always prefer that contracts be written down rather than made through an oral (spoken) agreement. Both of oral and written contracts are enforceable and states have specific laws dealing with the situation where both are used for the same contract.Having a written instrument helps to avoid or clarify disputes should a breach of contract occur. Written contracts are also preferred if there is no previous history of dealings between the parties, so they can keep written records as their business relationship builds.Ways in which a Contract may be BreachedAny failure to fulfill the duties according to the terms provided in the contract results in a breach of contract. Sometimes the breach is a result of directly failing to perform a specified duty, while at other times the breach can result from surrounding factors. Some of the different ways in which a breach of contract may occur are: "Non-Performance": This means a general failure to perform a duty. Not all failures to perform result in a breach of contract. In some instances performance is not required until the time specified in the contract. Until the time for performance arrives, performance is not due (for example, payment upon delivery means that you do not have to perform your payment duties until the shipment is delivered) Impossibility: A breach may be found if one of the parties takes an action which makes it impossible for the other party to render their performance. Usually measured by an objective standard (i.e., no one could perform the duty) Breach of an Implied Duty: Here the breach is not linked to a duty that is mentioned specifically in the contract. Sometimes courts will look at a contract and conclude that the performance implied other duties which are not written or stated. Examples of implied duties that may be breached are such a general duty of care or a duty to act in good faith. Anticipatory Breach: A court can conclude a breach of contract if one of the parties expressly states that they will not perform, or if they act in such a way that is inconsistent with forthcoming performance. This entitles the other party to relief even though a breach technically did not yet occur Total vs. Partial Breach: Breaches of a contract may either be total or partial. A total breach means that the breach has been so "material" (substantial) as to allow the other party to receive the entire benefit of the contract. Whether the breach is material is subject to the analysis of the court. A total breach will have different results in recovery options as opposed to a partial breach. Remedies available for Breach of ContractThere are several remedies available in the event that a contract is breached. These may be reduced or subject to modification if the injured party has also committed a breach. Compensatory Damages: These are monetary damages that are intended to compensate the injured party for the amount that they expected to received from the contract Consequential Damages: Intended to reimburse the injured party for damages that are indirectly caused by the breach Liquidation Damages: These are damages for amounts that are specifically agreed to and written into the contract Punitive Damages: Damages that are intended to punish the breaching party and deter them from future breaches. Rarely awarded in contract cases unless they involve a tort situation Nominal Damages: Damages that are awarded when the injured party did not actually incur a loss. Also rare because most breaches of contract typically cause some sort of loss to the other party Specific Performance: Not an award of money damages, but rather is an equitable remedy designed to compel the breaching party to perform their contract duties. Other equitable remedies (i.e., not involving money damages) are: Contract rescission: The old contract is canceled out and a new one may be formed Contract reformation: The court allows the parties to rewrite the contract Finally, please be aware that filing a breach of contract case in court requires that you follow the rules regarding the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations refers to the time period during which a case may be filed, which may be a number of years depending on the state. If the statute of limitations expires, you will no longer be able to file a case.Points to ConsiderIf you are involved in a breach of contract claim, whether you are the breaching or the non-breaching party, you should consider the following points: Written contracts are much more preferred than oral contracts because they provide a point of reference between the parties Each party should fulfill their duty according to the terms of the contract. The court can also imply duties in a contract A contract can be breached in several ways. Sometimes relief can be available even if breach technically did not occur Be familiar with the types of remedies available for breach of contract- some involve monetary payment while others involve equitable relief Be conscious of the statute of limitations and any other deadlines when filing Contact a lawyer who will help you in preparing and analyzing contract terms
Why Incorporate in California?
The New Zealand Employment Relations Amendment Bill 2013 will if passed change the law inter alia relating to Rest and Meal Breaks.
New provisions deal with the timing and duration of rest breaks and meal breaks.
There is also a provision that, for the purposes of where an Employer and Employee cannot agree on when the Employee is to take his or her breaks or on the duration of the breaks, the Employer may specify reasonable times and durations that, having regard to the Employer's operational environment or resources and the Employee's interests, enable the Employer to maintain continuity of service or production.
There are also new provisions that relate to compensatory measures.
1. A new section provides that an Employer is exempt from the requirement to provide rest breaks and meal breaks:
2. To the extent that the Employer and Employee agree that the Employee is to be provided with compensatory measures; or
3. to the extent that, having regard to the nature of the work performed by the Employee, the Employer cannot reasonably provide the Employee with rest breaks and meal breaks.
The Bill also clarifies that an Employer's entitlement to rest breaks is to paid rest breaks.
Need advice: Insurance Claims Lawyer Houston ?
Solution by the Way of Hearing Loss Compensation
In order to fully understand the relationship between asbestosis and mesothelioma, and clearly distinguish between these diseases, we must first learn about the cause, then set about defining each condition in a clear, yet non-technical manner.
What is Asbestos?
The name Asbestos was first given to this toxic mineral by the Ancient Greeks, and the word "Asbestos" literally means inextinguishable. Throughout much of the twentieth century asbestos was widely used in industry because of it's resistance to heat and flame, resistance to electricity and excellent insulation and sound proofing qualities. It is estimated that there are approximately 3,000 different commercial products which include the use of asbestos in the manufacture process.
Asbestos is made up of tiny microscopic fibers which are invisible to the naked eye, and these fibres will often become airborne when the material is damaged or disturbed. Once carried by air, the fibres may be inhaled into the lungs or even swallowed into he digestive system where they will almost certainly cause long term, significant health problems. Inhaled asbestos fibers will remain in the body and never be expelled, and because of this, the fibers penetrate body tissues and will often deposit themselves in airways and lung tissue.
There are six minerals which are defined as "asbestos" types. These are chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite, actinolite, tremolite and anthophyllite. The three most commonly used asbestos types are classed as white, brown, and blue, and it is the brown and blue asbestos types which are most often associated with being the cause of mesothelioma. Millions of people all over the world have been affected by the inhalation of asbestos fibers, putting them at risk of contracting asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other deadly diseases directly caused by these toxic levels of asbestos.
There are also major differences in the treatments of asbestosis and mesothelioma. Whilst treatment for asbestosis centers around preventing the condition from deteriorating and easing the symptoms, treatment for mesothelioma will depend on how far the cancer has developed. If diagnosed early enough, there is a good possibility that the cancerous tumors can be removed or abnormal cells killed using radiation or chemotherapy. Later stages of mesothelioma cancer can be treated, but treatment becomes more difficult if the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. Regardless of the type of treatment, both asbestosis and mesothelioma have a very poor prognosis.
Car Insurance Requirements Vary by StateIn order to prove a case in negligence, a party must be able to prove both legal and factual causation. In other words, the party must not only be able to prove that the actions of a party proved something but that the actions were also a legally sufficient cause to hold someone liable and find negligence. Factual and legal causation are said to be distinguished from each other in an effort to avert the danger of a defendant being exposed to "liability in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class," according to Justice Cardozo.Once a party has factually proven that the actions of the other party have caused his or her injuries, the question becomes one of legal causation. One of the key factors influencing legal causation is the remoteness of the person's harm from the negligence of the other. A person's negligence is too remote or not a "proximate cause" of another's injury or damages if a reasonable person would never reasonably foresee it happening. The idea of legal causation is to prevent negligence damages being awarded in events where no one could foresee something bad happening and so take the necessary steps to avoid it. In cases involving medical malpractice, proximate cause is something easier to prove, particularly in surgical errors. In failure to diagnose or missed diagnosis cases, the issue of proximate cause is not nearly as easy to prove since it's not as easy to tell what the actual damages are. Surgical errors are much easier, unless an individual has undergone a lot of surgeries with a number of different doctors in a very limited period of time. In medical malpractice cases, it is usually harder to prove that there was a breach than that the doctor who committed an error was negligent in terms of legal and factual cause. Determining the breach is more difficult since the error that was committed was not necessarily a monumental error or even identifiable as an error at the time it was committed. Causation is much easier to prove since there are typically very few surgeons capable of making an error on a person at one time. Damages are also usually somewhat simple to prove for the same reason. Depending on the case, particularly in surgery, it is simple to say "I have no feet because the doctor amputated the wrong one." The damages in the case are clear. The difficult part, for the jury, is awarding monetary damages.
Making a Tripping and Slipping Claim
Talking about amputation can make many people feel uncomfortable. However, this surgery actually saves lives if it is done for the right reason. If you or someone you know is facing amputation, this article can help you understand the reason for the surgery and how it is performed.
First, amputations mostly result due to accidents or injuries. However, they can also necessary in case of disease or infection. One man even cut off his own arm to free himself from being trapped in a rock slide after hiking. Amputation is typically needed in cases of severe blood loss or to deter infections from spreading to key organs such as your heart.
When injuries are especially traumatic, our bodies lose the ability to grow back new, healthy tissue. For instance, our cells rely on blood for oxygen and nutrients and the removal of wastes such as carbon dioxide from our system. If an injury such as a deep laceration drains the blood and keeps it from circulating to our extremities, these wastes can build up in our cells and kill them. If there is too much cell death, our bodies may be unable to replace the dead cells. Thus, in this case, amputation is necessary to rid ourselves of lifeless limbs.
Sadly, many causes of amputations are the result of personal injuries. Gunshots, car wrecks, and burns are but a few of the causes of injuries that need amputations. If you or someone you know has suffered a personal injury due to someone's negligence, you should speak to an attorney about your rights.
For more information, talk to a personal injury lawyer from the firm of Palmer & Associates PC, today.
Insurance Claim Denial - Know Your Rights
Regrettably, most of us will experience a road traffic accident at some time in our lives. If you are involved a road traffic accident, even if you are fortunate enough to not be injured, there is valuable advice you should follow including things that you should and shouldn't do.
If you, a friend or a loved one is unfortunate enough to suffer a personal injury from a road traffic accident, you should consult a personal injury solicitor
If involved in a road traffic accident resulting in injury, or sizeable damage to your vehicle, don't move from the scene of the accident until the police arrive and advise that you're OK to leave. If you're in any way unsure about the 'quantum' or amount of financial damage caused by an accident; take care of your actions as these can impact on any claim you make and affect any testimony you may have to make in court.
Seek Medical Help
Has someone been injured in the road traffic accident? Are you or anyone at the scene trained first aid? Then get them, or yourself to the injured immediately. Ensure that injured person isn't moved. Instruct the nearest person to contact the police and report the accident. Giving details of who is injured, how many persons are involved so that suitable emergency help is dispatched. Do what you can to warn and divert oncoming traffic away from the accident using hazard lights and any warning triangles available.
Typically, shock and adrenaline caused by any accident can hide the true symptoms of your accident.
Be sure to give the medical practitioner as much information as possible about how you're feeling as a result of the road traffic accident including:
i) loss of memory ii) headaches iii) blood or fluid in your ear iv) dizziness v) ringing in the ears vi) disorientation vii)nausea viii) confusion or other unusual physical or mental feelings
To prevent the onset of a concussion or other head and brain injuries do not avoid speaking to a medical practitioner or a doctor.
Child Custody - Things the Judge Will Consider
Violations of a child custody order or a visitation agreement can be serious and sometimes frightening because they might involve actions that pose a danger to the well-being of a child. If you feel that your child is involved in such a violation, you have several options both under civil and criminal law. Regardless of whether the remedy is sought under civil or criminal law, the other party is still entitled to notice and a proper hearing.
Civil remedies usually involve some form of monetary reimbursement or court order decreeing that the other spouse do something or refrain from doing something. Unlike criminal remedies, civil remedies are aimed at alleviating the wrongdoings rather than punishing the offending person. Some civil remedies for violations of a child custody order are:
- Contempt of court: The court may hold the violating party in contempt of court if there has been a previous court order involved. Contempt of court typically involves a fine for the violating party, as well as further orders and instructions, such as returning the child to the other parent.
- Injunctions and Restraining Orders: These are court orders which require the other party to take certain courses of action or to refrain from certain acts. These can include orders to stay a certain distance from a child, or orders not to contact the child. The party seeking an injunction or restraining order must usually be able to prove that other remedies (such as money damages) are insufficient to correct the situation.
- Monetary damages: In certain cases, one parent may be able to obtain money damages if the violation has resulted in ascertainable (provable) losses to the parent or child.
- Modification of the child custody/support/visitation order: Sometimes the offending spouse may be in violation simply because the child custody or visitation agreement has no longer become practical. For example, this may be due to a change in employment or a relocation to a different area. In such cases modifying the agreement can be a peaceable way to avoid further conflicts.
Do I need a Lawyer to Enforce the Custody and Visitation Order?
In some instances, hiring a lawyer is not the parent's most immediate concern, especially if the case involves an emergency such as a kidnapping or if the child cannot be located. In such emergencies, one should contact local police enforcement authorities in order to address the situation. However, after the situation has been remedied and the child's safety has been ensured, the person may wish to contact a lawyer to see what additional courses of action they have.
Even in less extreme cases, a parent would still be wise to contact a lawyer regarding violations of a child custody order. When contacting the lawyer, here are some points to consider in conclusion:
- Determine whether a formal child custody and visitation arrangement has been formally issued for the child and the parents. If none has been issued, it is probably best to obtain one diligently and without delay
- In the event of an actual violation of the custody order, understand the basic remedies available to you, and how they are different according to civil and criminal law settings
- If you cannot arrive at a suitable remedy, the court may still be able to assist you using their discretionary powers in order to issue a different decree