Why Hire a Intellectual Property Lawyer San Antonio with a similar background to yourself: Asian, Chinese, Philippine, Vietnamese, El Salvador, Guatemalan, Canadian, German, Latino, Mexican, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Greek, Romanian, Cuban, Korean, Indian, Hispanic, American, Foreign, Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Orthodox, Mormon, or Buddhist?
If you do you will need a lawyer. The trouble is there are several thousand Attorneys out there just on the internet and the choice in finding a Intellectual Property Lawyer San Antonio appropriate for your case becomes more difficult. When you are trying to find a representative there are a few guidelines you will want to follow. Below you will find out how to choose the appropriate lawyer for your needs.
When trying to find a lawyer you first must understand the case you have. Some cases are very easy to determine, for instance those who have been in an accident often have personal injury needs. Those with problems at a hospital with a medical condition will have a malpractice suit and on and on. Once you have determined the type of representative you need, finding a lawyer becomes a little easier.
You may have a general practice representative or someone you have dealt with in Intellectual Property Lawyer San Antonio law. Most of us know someone who has had a attorney in the past. In this case you can ask the person for a referral. If you have a business lawyer you can ask them to recommend someone in the field of expertise you need. They will often have at least one name for you and a few to keep away from. Those who have worked with lawyers such as family or friends will also be able to give recommendations. They may say you don’t want this person or that their associate can help you. In either case you are better off to ask for a referral in finding a lawyer rather than other options.
The key to finding a representative that will help you out is knowing as much about them professionally as possible. You want to understand how many years they have practiced and what their specialty really is. Other wise you may find someone who is more out for the gain they will get rather than the gain you will get. When you deal with finding a lawyer, ask them their policies. Kind of interview them during the course of the conversation as well. Some will not charge unless the case is won, while others will charge a small fee during the entire process. It will depend on the case and of course your representative.
70/30 Custody and Visitation SchedulesThe case of Westbrook Resources Ltd v Globe Metallurgical Inc , concerned a claimant who was entitled to damages arising out of the defendant's repudiatory breach of contract. The defendant was a manufacturer and supplier of metals. The claimant was a trader in metals.Following a number of lengthy negotiations the claimant and the defendant concluded a contract in January 2005. The contract was for the sale by the claimant to the defendant of approximately 30,000MT of manganese ore. The terms of that contract included as to size 'Screened over plus 1/2" screen at DLA'. It should be noted that 'DLA' was a reference to the United States' Defence Logistic Agency, a government agency which assembled huge quantities of manganese ore in stockpiles throughout the United States as part of strategic stockpiles of raw materials that might be required for military or national defence purposes. Over time DLA elected to sell some manganese ore via a tender process. The claimant successfully bided for two stores of manganese ore at Anniston, Alabama and Large, Pennsylvania respectively.The contract was not performed. According to the claimant, the contract was terminated by the claimant in May 2005 on account of the defendant's repudiatory breach which the claimant had subsequently accepted.The breach in question was said to be the refusal of the defendant to pay for the first barge of materials the claimant had arranged under the contract. Subsequent to the claimant sending an ultimatum stating that the defendant had two options, namely to pay for the first barge or risk the claimant treating the contract at an end, both parties accepted that the contract was ended and sought to mitigate their losses.The claimant then brought proceedings seeking damages for non-performance, whilst the defendant counterclaimed for damages flowing from the claimant's repudiatory breach of contract. The court decided that on the facts, the defendant had indeed committed a repudiatory breach. They held that the claimant had accepted that breach and was therefore entitled to damages.© RT COOPERS, 2007. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.
Catastrophic Injuries - Paralysis, Amputation, BurnsBusiness contracts are a key element for the business world. They make sure that individuals and corporations keep their promises and fulfill their obligations. In essence, contracts are an idea backed by confidence and that confidence is supported by the legal system. It, however, is important to remember that no matter whether a contract is written or oral, it can be legally enforced.When individuals or businesses fail to perform any particular term of a contract without a legitimate excuse, it is called a breach of contract. There are many ways that someone can breach a contract. It can include failure to complete a job, starting a job too late, failure to deliver goods as promised, not paying on time, not paying in full, or any move on their part which shows that they will not complete their work as promised (termed an anticipatory breach).A breach of contract can occur one time or it can be a series of continued breaches; should this occur, the injured party can file a civil lawsuit. The remedies for contractual breaches are not designed to punish the breaching party, however, they are meant to place the injured party into the same position they would be in if it weren't for the breach. When a contract is broken, the non-breaching party is relieved of his obligations under the contract, because of the other party's breach. When this happens, the courts very well may award damages as a result of the breach. In cases where monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the injured party, a court may award "specific performance," which forces the breaching party to fulfill their end of the agreement (contract).As discussed above, there are two general categories of relief for breach of contract: damages and performance. Damages refer to monetary compensation, whereas performance involves forcing the breaching party to do what they originally promised to do in the contract. A business litigation attorney who specializes in contract law can help you determine which method is best to settle your particular contract dispute.Before you file a breach of contract lawsuit, you should learn more about the different types of remedies available to you. Some people simply desire monetary compensation in order to make up for the grief the other side caused them whereas others want them to carry out their side of the agreement.Monetary damages can include compensatory damages (compensation for your losses), consequential and incidental damages (foreseeable damages), attorney fees (can only be recovered if included in the contract), liquidated damages (must be specified in the contract if there is a fraud), and punitive damages.Of course, the relative laws in force and the particular conduct of the breaching party will determine which kind of damages are awarded and how much. The more unconscionable the conduct, coupled with intentional behavior, the greater the chances you will be awarded larger punitive damages on behalf of the breach. In cases where the breach arose out of gross negligent behavior, compensatory and consequential damages are more likely to be received. When money cannot make up the damage, sometimes the other side will be ordered to perform their duties. This remedy is more common with real estate transactions, since the courts prefer not to get involved with monitoring because it takes up too much time and expense.Other remedies include rescission where the contract is canceled and both parties are excused from further performance and any deposits are returned. Another option is reformation where the terms of the contract are altered in order to accommodate what both parties originally intended.Before you file a lawsuit, you should discuss your case with a business litigation lawyer who can review the contract for you. There may be limitations or notice requirements contained within your contract that may have waived your ability to pursue contractual remedies. An attorney will also give you a clear understanding of how much full litigation would cost. There may be alternative dispute resolutions available to you that can save money and time in the long run.
Need advice: Intellectual Property Lawyer San Antonio ?
Common Contingency Clauses in a Real Estate Contract
Contingencies are commonly included in most real estate purchase agreements or contracts. They are written clauses that give protection to both the buyer and the seller of a home as well as give them time to assess important aspects of the home before proceeding to the closing. These are normally included in an effort to allow potential buyers and sellers to back out from the deal without facing legal issues in the event the contingencies are not met by either of the parties involved in the transaction.
The common contingencies are usually seen in pre-printed contract forms used by real estate agents. Below are some of them for your guidance.
A home inspection is normally asked by home buyers to ensure that the property they are buying is free from material defects. If in case some defects are discovered during the purchase period, they can ask for an immediate repair from the buyer or they can just back out of the deal. The contingency clauses can specify which party will shoulder the repairs and to what extend. Other options can be included for homes that require repair. A professional home inspection report specifies the date of the inspection and the status of the residential property concerned.
A contingency on deeds is applicable as well. The purchase offer can state what type of deed the buyer expects from the seller during closing. This should be accompanied by a statement from the seller ensuring that the real estate property will be free from liens and other issues that cropped up with the past owners.
So in essence, these contingencies are with a purpose thus, it is vital that they be stated in the contract in the most specific way as possible.
There's no limit to the types of whiplash injuries which can be suffered by people under very bizarre or unusual circumstances, but fairground and amusement park rides seem to be strong contenders for the most common cause of strange accidents.
For instance, in 2009 a fairground accident resulted in 21 people suffering injures on a Blackpool rollercoaster.
The 'Big Dipper' ride experienced problems when one of the cars got stuck and was hit from behind by a car which followed along after it - usually at a safe distance.
Three people were treated in hospital for face and neck injuries and the others were described as 'walking wounded', but they might have felt the effects of whiplash later that day.
Symptoms can remain hidden for six to 12 hours in some cases, and occasionally continue getting worse for a few days after the initial injury.
In a 2011 incident in Skegness, 22 people were trapped for more than an hour on the 'Surf Rider'.
The ride, which was a classic mechanical swing boat-type machine - the ones with a giant arm which rocks the rows of seats back and forth slowly getting higher and higher - had broken mid swing.
This meant that all the people on board were stuck at about an 80 degree angle. A witness stated, "It looked like the ride had snapped on its axle and people were stuck. They were leaning on their side & it looked pretty uncomfortable."
According to one piece of research from May 2006 entitled 'Alberta rodeo athletes do not develop the chronic whiplash syndrome' - well the title explains the study's conclusion.
Although the rodeo participants and spectators questioned had all suffered about the same number of car crashes, the rodeo participants took fewer days off work and stated that their whiplash symptoms lasted for less time than the spectators stated.
It seems that they either have a higher pain threshold due to the sport they participate in, or that their necks have become more supple and the ligaments and tendons cannot be over-stretched as easily as in people who undertake no neck-related exercise.
Perhaps if everyone regularly undertook neck exercise which made their neck stronger and suppler, whiplash injuries wouldn't have such a severe effect on the victims of car accidents and any pain would only be felt short-term.
And next time you go on a fairground ride, perhaps you should do some limbering up exercises before being strapped in to save yourself a neck injury.
Online Incorporation and LLC Formation Services - Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons
A slip, fall or trip accident refers to a situation when a person suffers an injury by slipping, tripping and falling due to dangerous conditions in a particular property. This type of accident can occur in different locations under numerous hazardous circumstances.
Hazardous or dangerous circumstances refer to the failure of the landowner or proprietor to provide counter measures to prevent accidents from happening. Usually, a slip and fall or trip and fall accident occur when the location of the accident evidently showed long-term hazards such as poor lighting, broken stairs, slippery floors and the like which the management failed to act upon immediately.
Hence, the landowner or proprietor may be held accountable for the injury if proven that the accident happened due to negligence.
The landowner or proprietor has no obligation to neither inspect nor fix defects but he or she has the responsibility to ensure that the licensee is aware of potential hazards.
A trespasser receives no invitation or permission nor is he or she welcome to enter the establishment. The landowner or proprietor is not liable for possible slip and fall or trip and fall accident when he or she is unaware of a trespasser. Once made known that a trespasser is in his area of responsibility, it should be properly observed that warnings are issued.
If you are involved in a slip and fall or trip and fall accident, it is highly advisable to seek legal advice to determine your eligibility to file for a claim.
I am a do-it-yourselfer. I love working around my house: Painting, building, and even stuccoing. But there are exceptions, like plumbing. I hate plumbing.
One thing I have learned about my handyman hobby is that I should expect to buy twice the building materials that I should need to complete the project. Experience tells me that I will use all of those materials. My habit is to try to build the first time, fail, and then to try it again. Almost invariably, I will end up building or fixing up the same thing at least twice -- once or twice for practice, and then "for real."
Some who would never consider fixing a garage door or stuccoing a wall would unthinkingly prepare a will or trust using many materials found in bookstores. Bookstores abound with quick-fix be-your-own-lawyer books and CDs, featuring forms and fill-the-blank forms and programs for wills, trusts, and powers of attorney for healthcare decisions. Some of these materials are even state specific, offering different provisions for residents of different states.
Some of these do-it-yourself materials are fine, and may even be useful. If correctly used, many of these forms might work for a do-it-yourselfer. But suppose your case is different? Suppose you fail to properly use the form?
One thing I have noticed about building materials is that the old rule of thumb generally applies: you get what you pay for. The same is true in estate planning. But it is also true that legal documents such as wills and trusts oftentimes do not "speak" until the author is deceased or incapacitated. Because of this fact, in the case of estate plans the handyman analogy of buying double the building materials breaks down. If a wall is improperly built, it can be torn down and redone. But if a will is improperly drafted, or if it fails to state the intent of the author, there is often no opportunity for a second try. Rather, in many cases, when the author of the will or trust is incapacitated or deceased, the planning "solution" either fails, or has completely unexpected and unwanted consequences.
Still, to be a good consumer of legal services, self-education is essential in communicating needs to an estate planning professional. The following is an overview of some of the major estate planning topics that should be applicable in most states.
Help! I Must Avoid Probate!
Whither Will or Trust?
Like anything, there are pros and cons when choosing between a will and a trust. Most of the pros and cons relate to cost:
- Wills are generally less expensive than trusts to prepare. Trusts are usually more extensive documents, and require property transfers when "funding" them.
- Trusts are usually less expensive to administer than wills. However, probating a will can be expensive, depending upon the size of the estate. While there are costs associated with trust administration, it is usually less expensive than filing a petition to probate a will.
Depending upon the circumstance, trusts can provide similar benefits as certain types of conservatorships. If a settlor becomes unable to handle his or her own affairs, the successor trustee can step in and make the necessary decisions to manage the settlors' financial affairs. Wills do not offer this benefit. However, if a person suffers from dementia, for example, a conservatorship "of the person" may still be necessary.
There are benefits to each approach. Also, the law governing wills and trusts may vary from state to state. You should consult with a competent estate planning attorney to choose the right approach for you.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is not legal advice, and the use of it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Any liability that might arise from your use or reliance on this article or any links from this article is expressly disclaimed. This article is not to be acted upon as if it were legal advice, and is subject to change without notice, or may include obsolete or dated information, or information not relevant to your jurisdiction. If you require legal services, you should consult with an attorney.
Making a Tripping and Slipping Claim
Every employee finds themselves in one situation or another where they require employment law services. Whether it is discrimination at work, bullying and harassment, maternity and paternity issues, compromise agreements, dismissal, redundancy, whistle blowing, etc, these solicitors provide the legal expertise to help you protect your interests.
In every employment contract, there are a large number of details that are sometimes hard to understand especially for a layman. This is why most employment law services will suggest and indeed, contraindicate, one signing off on a contract before they have consulted an employment law solicitor. This is especially the case when one is getting into a long term employment contract. It is important that as one does so, they are fully aware of all the finer details enshrouded in the contract.
Employment law services cater adequately to negotiations and as such, retain qualified staff that are experienced and trained in negotiating. Because this is the most critical part of the process, ensure you retain only the best counsel. Once the negotiation proceedings are under way, you will have an opportunity to articulate your grievance to your employer and attempt at a bipartisan settlement. More often than not, most employers will gun for a settlement at this point as it represents the fastest, cheapest and most convenient way of settling the matter, for all parties involved.